Fr. Fessio's Disservice to Catholic Chaplains
09/03/09
Next time you or a loved one are in the hospital and a Catholic chaplain comes to give communion, pray or talk, remember that he is there because he is being punished and has been been banished. His punishment/banishment have occurred because he had a personality clash with his superiors or bishop. Or he is there because he is not very well educated or gifted. In fact, he may even be a half-wit. Well-educated and gifted priests such as Rev. Joseph Fessio, S.J. have more to contribute than ministering to sick nobodies and nothings and are only assigned to hospital ministries when they are being punished.

The above paragraph is more or less the text of a comment I attempted to post under an article mentioning Fr. Fessio that was recently published in a diocesan Catholic newspaper. I won't identify the paper because what I'm going to say about its coverage is not very complimentary and Lord knows, I have embarrassed the Catholic press enough as it is.

Posting comments under articles is not my style, but in this case I felt that I had to file a minority report among the other sentiments that included such words as "awesome" in predicates about Fr. Fessio. I pushed the "Post Comment" button and immediately got a window telling me that my less-than-1500-word two-cents worth was being reviewed by an editor. Of course, it never appeared on-line.

However that's not the beef I have with this Catholic paper. The problem I have with it is that its article perpetuated the story that Fr. Fessio was banished --the word used in the article--to a hospital ministry.

In the news business, we who believe in objective reporting have proverbs such as: One man's "rant" is another man's "reasoned argument." We therefore consider it unethical to describe anyone's speech--say, at a town hall meeting--as a "rant". Objective and competent reporters covering a controversy do not report as fact one party's characterization of, that is, spin on, an issue or event. One man's "banishment" is another man's "assignment" (the word that should be used) and perhaps even a third man's "calling from God."

Father Fessio has spun his assignment out in the California sticks by his Jesuit superior as "exile," banishment for being an orthodox Catholic in an order filled with liberal dissenters.

"I'm being picked on by liberals!" has of late become a "last refuge" as Dr. Johnson would say. It is certainly true that the Society of Jesus of recent decades has been a hotbed of dissent and it's certainly possible that such dissenters may vindictively transfer a priest because of his orthodox views. However it is also possible that they transfer him because he is a pain in the aleck-kafoozalem. Just as it is possible for a person to be fired because he is an incompetent employee and not as he claims, a member of a certain ethnic group, or a conservative.

Imagine yourself to be a provincial head--or bishop--and you have a priest who is running around, getting involved in all kinds of big busts: a Catholic radio network that is a failure, a college (Campion) that is a failure. Until he was fired for good last month, Fr. Fessio was involved with pretend-billionaire Tom Monaghan's make-believe university in a Florida swamp (When that fails, its supporters will be sure to blame liberals).

Imagine yourself to be supervising a priest who has all the symptoms of a huge ego that he balms by mixing himself up in risky, grandiose projects that may bring scandal to the church. Even if you're orthodox--but not a fool--you'll want to make him cool his heels, too.

In April, 2002 Fr. Fessio was quoted in the San Jose Mercury News as saying of his assignment to a hospital: "They are trying to get me out of the way. Why else would they exile me? I am highly educated. I'm in the prime of my life. I have so much more to contribute than to minister to the sick.'' (1)

In all my reading about this Jesuit, I have never encountered anyone other than myself who has expressed shock about this statement. Here is a Catholic priest saying that ministering to the sick is beneath him, a waste of his time. He is also saying that hospital ministry is a punishment and suitable only for the less-than-highly-educated. Shame on my fellow orthodox Catholics for not catching this.

What a slap in the face to the the likes of Frs. Allan Helwig and John V. Connor who for years ministered in hospitals and nursing homes in the Washington Archdiocese, to Fr. Francis X. Walsh who dropped dead of a heart attack on his way to visit the sick. And what a slap in the face to humble Jesuits such as Fr. James Byrne, who had umpteen degrees and who wore his humble novice jacket until death, or Fr. Aloysius "Wish" Galvin who exuded strong, compassionate joyful Catholicism, or Fr. John Nicola who taught Thomistic philosophy when no one else cared about it.

Yeah, Ignatius Press publishes great books, indispensable books, but anyone who thinks its editor is "Da Man" or some kind of a model priest hasn't been to school or around the big-city block.

Other faces that have gotten a slapping in the Fessio legend include those of Jesuit Father General Hans Peter Kolvenbach, Cardinal Christoph Schönborn and the current pope. Also repeated in the Catholic newspaper article noted above is the story that Ave Maria University officials--meaning Tom Monaghan and those who do his bidding--with the help of Schönborn and then-Cardinal Ratzinger, went to Kolvenbach and got him to permit Fessio's transfer from "exile" at Santa Rosita Hospital to Ave Maria University.

If this rescue-from-the-liberals tale is true, and I have my doubts, it means that Schönborn, Ratinger/Benedict XVI and Kolvenvach all agree that hospital ministry is a punishment and unworthy of the brilliant. It also suggests that they, too were wowed by Tom Monaghan's money.

(1) "Publisher of Roman Catholic Literature to Take Los Angeles Chaplain Post,"
by Renee Khoury
San Jose Mercury News (San Jose, CA), April 23, 2002
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-120490022.html
Verified by San Francisco Faith
http://www.sffaith.com/ed/news/0602news.htm


(2) Ad Orientem

Ad Orientem: a Hook to Pull Celebrity Priests off the Stage?

As you may have gleaned by reading other pieces on this web site, I think that one of the ugly by-products of the Catholic Church's great renewal in this new millennium is "the Catholic celebrity," someone who projects himself as some kind of a model or hero, or who does not strenuously point to Christ when celebrity is thrust upon him. The worst ones are the priests. They're supposed to lead lives of poverty, chastity and humility (whether they formally vow to do so or not).

The "Catholic celebrity" is helped in his self-promotion by Catholic media and a network of other notables who scratch his back (reciprocally, of course), plug his books and tell everybody that he's the greatest human being who ever lived. Even if he does have a sincere concern for the church's mission and is not just a narcissist or out for his own aggrandizement, he has faith in money and power and can always be found snug in bed with them and willing to act as attack dog for their defense.

Of course such opportunists are enabled by hero-worshippers, who are usually--and sorry, I'm going to sound like Obama here--simple conservative folk who feel frustrated and powerless and are attracted to personalities who promise to run the bad guys out of town. They want what the Hebrews hoped for in The Messiah. I have to add that these simple folk are more interested in running the bad guys out than in making sure that they're not the bad guys themselves.

St. Paul was certainly a Catholic celebrity who encountered such worship in his time. He chewed out the Corinthians about it, scolding that some were saying,"I belong to Paul," or "I belong to Apollos," or "I belong to Cephas," or "I belong to Christ." Then he points them toward Christ by asking, "Was it Paul who was crucified for you?" (I Cor.1:12-13).

Now Christ could certainly be tough if it was warranted--as when He cleansed the temple--but otherwise, walking up to everybody He differed with and punching them out was not his usual modus operandi. When tempted by Satan, He eschewed political (the Kingdoms of the World) and economic (bread, nowadays money) power. A pugnacious attitude and faith in human power and money should not be the style of any of Christ's followers or their leaders.

Recently Bishop Edward J. Slattery of the Diocese of Tulsa, Oklahoma announced that he will celebrate Mass in the cathedral in a traditional and now seldom-used form in which priest and people face the same direction. This is called "Ad Orientem" or "Liturgical East" because in the early church, Mass was said facing East whenever possible.

One of the reasons Bishop Slattery cited for his restoration of this ancient tradition of priest and people facing the same direction is that the versus populum (facing the people) Mass tends to place "an inordinate importance on the personality of the celebrant by placing him on a kind of liturgical stage."

What are narcissistic priests to do if ad orientem becomes the rule? They can't all be in Tom Monaghan's pocket or appear on EWTN.

--NJC

Copyright 2009 by Neal J. Conway. All rights reserved.
About this site and Neal J. Conway

Make homepage nealjconway.com appear in this window